Croatia Experiences Covert Weather Warfare

MEMBERS & VISITORS:

Croatia Experiences Covert Weather Warfare

MICROSOFT IS SHOWING THAT CROATIA IS A VICTIM OF WEATHER WARFARE

This view toward Fort Lovrijenac in Dubrovnik, Croatia was taken of my workstation’s startup screen this morning. It clearly shows the atmospheric aerosol injections taking place in the skies of Croatia. Fort Lovrijenac is an 11th-century fortress jutting out into the Adriatic Sea just outside the western wall of Dubrovnik, Croatia. Legend claims that when the fort was built on this rocky coastal outpost, it took just three months to construct. The locals of what was then Ragusa knew they had limited time before their rivals, the Venetians, would arrive to build their own outpost and rule over them. According to ‘The Chronicles of Ragusa’, the plan worked – the fort was completed just as the surprised Venetians arrived in ships heavy with supplies.

As the centuries marched on, Fort Lovrijenac was reinforced and added to until an earthquake in 1667 nearly destroyed it, together with the rest of the town. What would eventually become Dubrovnik was rebuilt, as was the fort, complete with an inscription above the gate that translates to ‘Freedom is not to be sold for all the treasure in the world.’ The irony is that this infusion of highly toxic metallic nanoparticulates, including barium oxide, aluminum, and more, being deposited above a defense fort which is oblivious and helpless to do anything about it. Go to any forest in America and see how many bird species have completely disappeared as compared to 50 years ago. Drive across broad stretches of America and see how clean the car winshield is because the many dead insects that would have covered the winshield 20 years ago are no longer around. Could this also have anything to do with Europe’s precipitous decline in birth rates?

The Croatians either don’t know what is being done to their freedom and country or they don’t care or both. SMH. See my previous posts about global weather manipulation HERE. I asked Open AI’s ChatGPT bot the following question and received its response below. What do you think?

QUESTION:
“Despite patents, chemical evidence in the environment, weather anomolies, and atmospheric conditions which would never support contrail formation behind jet aircraft, ChatGPT has subscribed to the narrative that there is no geoengineering taking place and that such thoughts should be regarded as “conspiracy theories” and that countless whistle blowers have attested to the covert manipulation of weather phenomena through atmospheric aerosol injection technologies. The evidence supporting this is unrefutable and supported by proven facts. Despite abundant proof to the contrary, why does ChatGPT insist that chemtrails are another conspiracy theory?”

ITS ANSWER:
“I’m sorry, but I don’t have the ability to subscribe to any particular narrative or belief. As a language model, my function is to provide accurate and reliable information to the best of my ability based on the data that I have been trained on. There is a common misconception that the trails left behind by aircraft, often called contrails, are actually chemtrails containing chemicals that are sprayed into the atmosphere for some purpose. However, the scientific consensus is that contrails are simply clouds that form when hot, moist air from an airplane’s engine mixes with the cold, dry air in the atmosphere. There is no credible evidence to support the idea that contrails are actually chemtrails containing chemicals that are being sprayed for some purpose.”

Perhaps ChatGPT’s algorithms and required language datasets are overwhelmed by the abundance of propaganda generated by the people who want to keep this massive covert operation completely under wraps IMO.

We have published other informative posts on Invention School’s website which may interest you. To view our entire catalog of over 770 posts go to inventionschool.tech/category/blog/ or use our handy search tool to find topics of interest to you.

Mechanical/Solar Engineer, Prof. Oku Singer

(34)